NEB Class 12 • English • Language Development • Unit 20

Power & Politics: NEB Class 12 English Guide

Study Audre Lorde’s “An Open Letter to Mary Daly” through voice, selective representation, race and gender, silence, accountability, coalition, adjective order and article writing.

Audre LordeIntersectional powerAdjective order

Who writes to whom, and why?

Audre Lorde, a Black lesbian poet, essayist and activist, wrote to feminist theologian Mary Daly on 6 May 1979 after reading Gyn/Ecology. Lorde acknowledges that Daly’s earlier analyses had strengthened her. Because the new book also troubles her, she writes as a critical colleague rather than a detached enemy. After receiving no reply for months, Lorde opens the letter to a wider community of women.

Why use an open letter?

An open letter addresses a named person but invites public judgment. It combines personal voice, evidence, argument and ethical appeal. Lorde initially seeks dialogue, yet silence turns the exchange into a community issue. Publishing the letter makes exclusion visible and asks readers to examine power within movements that claim liberation.

Selective representation is not inclusion

Lorde asks why Daly’s images of goddesses and female power remain mainly white, Western European and Judeo-Christian. Black women and women outside Europe appear largely when the book needs examples of genital mutilation or victimization. Their cultural power, resistance and creative histories are missing. Lorde’s point is not that suffering should be hidden; it is that a group cannot be represented truthfully through suffering alone.

Race and gender cannot be separated neatly

Women do not experience patriarchy in an identical way. Race, class, sexuality, colonial history and location shape danger and opportunity. A feminism that treats the white Western woman as the universal woman leaves others outside its analysis. Lorde therefore insists that difference must be recognized and used, not ignored in the name of superficial unity.

How oppression can be repeated inside resistance

A movement may challenge male domination while preserving racial hierarchy. When white women consume Black women’s words without entering dialogue or acknowledging Black women as theorists, they reproduce unequal power. Lorde describes this as an old pattern: the knowledge of marginalized women is used, but their full humanity and authority are not heard.

Why does Daly’s lack of reply matter?

Silence is not neutral when one participant has asked for accountable dialogue. Lorde recognizes a long history of Black women speaking and white women refusing to hear. Daly’s non-response turns a disagreement about a book into evidence of the relationship being criticized. The letter’s publication refuses to let private silence erase a public political problem.

Respect, disappointment and urgency

Lorde begins with thanks and solidarity, names useful parts of Daly’s work, and wishes her strength. She then asks precise, difficult questions. This structure prevents the letter from becoming simple abuse: respect does not cancel criticism, and criticism does not erase earlier value. The tone grows urgent because the issue involves living women, racial violence and the possibility of genuine coalition.

Why are rhetorical questions powerful?

Questions such as why powerful non-European women are absent require Daly—and the reader—to examine selection, sources and assumptions. A rhetorical question can accuse without pretending the answer is simple. It also keeps dialogue theoretically open: Lorde asks for explanation and change rather than merely declaring Daly permanently beyond response.

Unity requires accountable difference

Lorde does not reject cooperation among women. She rejects unity built by making one group’s experience universal. Durable coalition requires listening, citation, self-criticism and recognition of different histories. People with relative privilege must do more than invite marginalized people into an unchanged framework; the framework itself must be revised by what those voices reveal.

Victim, survivor and creator

Limited frameFuller frame
Uses Black women only to show harm.Includes intellectual, spiritual and political traditions.
Treats difference as an inconvenience.Treats difference as knowledge.
Quotes words without relationship.Credits thinkers and enters dialogue.
Assumes one universal woman.Examines interacting forms of power.

Detail → interpretation

DetailMeaning
Lorde thanks Daly firstCritique can emerge from serious engagement.
Goddess images remain white and WesternThe framework mistakes one tradition for universality.
Black women appear as victimsSelective inclusion removes agency and power.
No reply arrivesSilence mirrors historical refusal to hear.
Letter opens to the communityPrivate exclusion becomes a public political concern.

Words in the argument

WordContextual meaning
generativeable to produce new ideas or growth
provokingstimulating thought or strong response
reluctanceunwillingness or hesitation
tokenismsymbolic inclusion without structural equality
oppressionsystematic cruel or unjust control
accountabilityresponsibility to explain and answer for actions

English adjective order

When several adjectives appear before a noun, the usual sequence is opinion, size, age, shape, colour, origin, material, purpose, noun. Not every slot must be filled, and natural writing rarely needs a very long chain.

OrderExample
opinion + age + origin + nounan influential modern American writer
size + shape + material + nouna large rectangular wooden table
opinion + colour + nouna powerful Black feminist voice
age + origin + purpose + nounan early European religious text

Adjectives after linking verbs do not follow the same stacking problem: “The argument is urgent and precise.”

Short account and article

Short accountArticle
Chronological record of an event or experience.Title, introduction, organized discussion and conclusion.
Answers who, what, when, where and outcome.Develops a public issue with evidence and viewpoint.
Usually past tense.Tense depends on topic and evidence.

For an article on inclusive politics, define the issue, explain one mechanism of exclusion, give a relevant example, consider a counterpoint and end with a practical recommendation.

Can disagreement strengthen a movement?

Yes, when participants listen, support claims with evidence and accept accountability. Suppressing disagreement protects existing power, while personal attack without dialogue can fragment cooperation. Lorde models a demanding middle path: she acknowledges shared work, names structural exclusion and asks for change. Coalition becomes stronger when criticism expands whose knowledge counts.

Common mistakes

  • Saying Lorde rejects all of Daly’s work.
  • Reducing the letter to a personal quarrel.
  • Calling token inclusion equal representation.
  • Discussing gender without Lorde’s racial critique.
  • Treating Daly’s silence as irrelevant.
  • Stacking adjectives in random order.
  • Writing an article without title, structure or evidence.

Use the Class 12 English roadmap, compare rights in the Human Rights guide, and review evidence-based disagreement in the War and Peace guide.

Power and Politics questions and answers

Who wrote the open letter?

Audre Lorde wrote it to feminist theologian Mary Daly in 1979.

What is Lorde’s main criticism?

Daly’s framework centres white Western women and uses Black women selectively as victims.

Why does Lorde praise Daly first?

She shows genuine engagement and distinguishes valuable analysis from serious exclusion.

Why publish the letter?

After no reply, Lorde makes the pattern of silence accountable to the wider community.

What does difference contribute?

Different histories reveal forms of power that a supposedly universal framework may hide.

What is the adjective-order rule?

The usual sequence is opinion, size, age, shape, colour, origin, material and purpose before the noun.

Curriculum and authoritative references

KTM Tuition support

Plan your application with KTM Tuition

KTM Tuition is a study abroad consultancy opposite Shankerdev Campus in Putalisadak, Kathmandu. We help Nepali students review profiles, shortlist universities and courses, prepare applications, organise documents, research scholarships, and plan CAS and visa-file stages using current official sources. Universities and immigration authorities make all admission and visa decisions.

MKS Education • Putalisadak

Plan Your Next Step After Grade 12

Ask MKS Education about IELTS, PTE, DET and SAT preparation or study-abroad pre-counselling. Confirm the current class mode, counselling schedule, fees and admission support directly before enrolling.